Friday, July 15, 2005

New! Reichert Watch

Previously, we provided a list of the US Senate co-sponsors of reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

Here is a list of the co-sponsors of the same bill in the US House of Representatives.

On this list you will find the usual suspects from Washington State, such as Jim McDermott, who never met an anti-Constitutional law he did not fully embrace as long as it fit with his socialist ideology (and to think this guy opposes the Patriot Act on Constitutional grounds). But, you will also find Republican Dave Reichert, Representative from Washington’s 8th District, which is in King County.

Dave Reichert has opportunistically been selling the men of his district up the river as a way to gain popularity on the waves of manufactured hysteria and myths propagated by the domestic violence industry. He has been doing this in support of the worst legislation since old Jim Crow laws. VAWA has resulted in the loss of the most basic Constitutional rights of men and fathers in his district, while doing nothing to help either men or women who are victims of abuse.

There are few things more disgusting in politics than watching an elected official screw a class of constituents for personal political gain. For that distinction, we are adding a new on-going series called “Reichert Watch” in which we will pick this man apart and present multiple reasons why he is not fit for the office he currently holds, or any other elected office.

Dave Reichert is no friend of men, fathers, or families. Anyone that cares about them ought not vote for Reichert when he comes up for re-election.

And, now that Dino Rossi has officially removed himself from the race against Maria Cantwell (one of the most reliably anti-male, anti-father gender feminists in the state), Reichert will obviously be salivating over the prospect of running against her. He will use his support of VAWA as a way of saying to the gender feminist crowd of Seattle, "See? I'm not so bad."

Reichert is among those Republicans – that is, most Republicans – who just assume they have the vote of men in the bag and so happily support legislation that treats them like second class citizens. The next time an election rolls around, men and fathers in King County or the entire state should not give Reichert their vote. If voting for a Democrat is unpalatable, we recommend voting for a Libertarian.

These legislative atrocities will continue until people like Dave Reichert learn that there is a price to pay.

In the meantime, go here to send an e-mail complaining to Dave Reichert about his cynical support of the bigoted and radically ideological VAWA. Ask him if he knows the ideological roots of the Duluth Model and how it is being applied to men in his district.

While you are at it, you might want to refer to this report from Ireland, which was based on sound statistical sampling and clearly demonstrates that their is no gender bias when it comes to perpetrating or suffering from domestic violence.

The ideologically centered gender feminists, and the chivalrous cowards like Reichert who support them, hate real science. That explains why Senator Biden will not allow anyone that is not from the domestic violence industry to testify in the Senate hearing on VAWA on July 19.

6 Comments:

Blogger Mark said...

How 'bout the emotional and financial abuse perpetrated by women against men?

How 'bout the fact that married woman has a gun to the head of her husband the entire time they're married? Is that emotional abuse? It was when it happend to me.

How 'bout the fact that a wife can choose at any time to destroy a man's life for any reason or no reason? Is that financial abuse? It was in my case.

How 'bout the fact that a wife can take a man's house, his kids, half his money, and destroy his career and business? Is that emotional abuse? It was in my case.

Aren't men who come through all that "battered"? I know I was.

The abuse perpetrated by women against men is far worse than physical abuse. Physical wounds heal, but the emotional and financial damage done to men is long term, chronic, and uncurable in many cases.

7/16/2005 03:16:00 PM  
Blogger Iguana said...

All the more reason to focus our efforts.

7/16/2005 04:56:00 PM  
Blogger Tom Swanson said...

I often wonder, what will happen when the majority of males chose to never get married on day for those reasons Mark.

I hope I'm alive so I can say to the feminist, "I told you so. . .you created this mess".

7/16/2005 07:22:00 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

Radical feminism has destroyed the institution of marriage. I believe that any man who marries any woman is committing a foolish, reckless, irresponsible act. I think you're right... eventually marriage rates will approach zero.

What happens to society then? Men are going to continue to want to get laid. Women will continue to get knocked up.

Do we want a whole society full of single mothers?

7/16/2005 08:27:00 PM  
Blogger One man said...

That is why they developed "meretricious relationships." You no longer have to be married OR have kids to get screwed by some lazy, greedy, bitch.

7/16/2005 09:08:00 PM  
Blogger One man said...

Oya and, I have yet to find the source data but it is believed that 75% of inmates come from single mother households. Or is it 75% of violent criminals come from single mother homes. Any help with this data would be appreciated. I will post it in the "real data" section of this blog.

7/16/2005 09:10:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Main