King County (Seattle) Sheriff Sue Rahr wants to hear from the sheeples, unless it is about DV
There was an article on Monday, in the Seattle P-I fishwrapper, about finding missing persons using cell phone records. Sorry, the on-line version was cut down and doesn’t have the quote about "we don't want to assist perps in finding their DV victims".
Now the story had nothing to do with DV, she inserted that little bait.
So, having a "relationship" with her Spinmeister, Sgt. John Urquhart, I wrote him a note, and copied her (text below) on what I thought of that.
I thought the note was fairly complimentary, but not the evil Sheriff Susan Rahr, who is in bed with the DV Divas, and their FLEAS© (That is Family Law Elitist Attorneys).
Bottom line, she thought she was replying to Herr Urquhart, but instead, sent it to the Geezer.
Now we know what the pols think of us, when we take the time to write at their invitation, and tell them what we think.
Oh, and that is really her desk phone number in her signature line.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rahr, Susan
To: The Geezer
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:06 PM
Subject: RE: Two things, two emails, this is the first
Who is this jerk?
Sue Rahr, King County Sheriff
516 3rd Ave.
Seattle, Wa. 98104
206-296-4155
From: The Geezer
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 7:49 AM
To: Urquhart, John
Subject: Two things, two emails, this is the first
Your boss did a nice job with the press on the cell phone tracking article this morning. No doubt due to your working with her, to give her just the right words.
You can tell her that I said so.
And I don't say nice things about her that often.
However, (a good friend told me to always ignore everything before the words however or but) her dragging the canard DV into it really detracted from the piece......from memory.....'we don't want to reunite an abuser with his victim'.......
So, I can make a public records request, or you can just tell me. How may times, over what time frame (last year or last two years) have there been requests that you determined were an abuser chasing down the victim of DV requesting you track them down via cell records??
Yeah, that is what I thought.
The Geez
FLEAS © Lisa Scott
Now the story had nothing to do with DV, she inserted that little bait.
So, having a "relationship" with her Spinmeister, Sgt. John Urquhart, I wrote him a note, and copied her (text below) on what I thought of that.
I thought the note was fairly complimentary, but not the evil Sheriff Susan Rahr, who is in bed with the DV Divas, and their FLEAS© (That is Family Law Elitist Attorneys).
Bottom line, she thought she was replying to Herr Urquhart, but instead, sent it to the Geezer.
Now we know what the pols think of us, when we take the time to write at their invitation, and tell them what we think.
Oh, and that is really her desk phone number in her signature line.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rahr, Susan
To: The Geezer
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:06 PM
Subject: RE: Two things, two emails, this is the first
Who is this jerk?
Sue Rahr, King County Sheriff
516 3rd Ave.
Seattle, Wa. 98104
206-296-4155
From: The Geezer
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 7:49 AM
To: Urquhart, John
Subject: Two things, two emails, this is the first
Your boss did a nice job with the press on the cell phone tracking article this morning. No doubt due to your working with her, to give her just the right words.
You can tell her that I said so.
And I don't say nice things about her that often.
However, (a good friend told me to always ignore everything before the words however or but) her dragging the canard DV into it really detracted from the piece......from memory.....'we don't want to reunite an abuser with his victim'.......
So, I can make a public records request, or you can just tell me. How may times, over what time frame (last year or last two years) have there been requests that you determined were an abuser chasing down the victim of DV requesting you track them down via cell records??
Yeah, that is what I thought.
The Geez
FLEAS © Lisa Scott
Labels: King County Sheriff, Sue Rahr, Susan Rahr
posted by The Geezer at 7:11 PM
2 Comments:
Good article. No doubt this is a very confusing issue for those who always think in terms of "Man bad," "Woman good."
Every opportunity to educate is a good thing.
Dragonfly51
"The male version ALSO says similar things when the pen is inserted into his ass. Well, almost. There are no ‘approving indicators’ or ‘good mood’ categories. Only cries of pain…humorous as they are!"
Why doesn't the male version have approving indicators or good mood categories? Sounds like the female version has a mixed message. If she says "no," it really means yes. But the male version definitely does not like to be raped...
Post a Comment
<< Main